Sunday, January 13, 2013

Getting Into Home Business Network Marketing - C & AM

Posted by James K. Watts on Jan 12, 2013 in Internet Marketing |




There?s two sides to the network marketing coin (and I assure you it is nothing like Harvey Dent?s coin): one is for the IBOs who are enjoying positive results within their MLM business efforts and the other is for those looking into home business network marketing industry as a means of acquiring a second income source. Either way, each side are quite promising and you are thinking about entering into a world of business that is much more interesting and fascinating than considering exactly the same office day in and day out. It?s quite possible that you?ve developed worn out of the malaise surrounding your cubicle and it?s time you had been confronted with some new faces and merchandise by way of a new endeavor in a home-based business according to multi-level marketing.

If you are an IBO, you?re on the side that?s distributing a very popular network marketing product. By your success, you represent whether your franchise is the kind of company into which new prospects would like to try investing their time and expense. You may have a downline, small or big, also it attracts income opportunity seekers who wants to transition from doing work for another person to working for themselves.

Whenever they get to know you through your downline, you?d like them to find out that you?re a reliable business and you and your group are adhering to the highest standards of business integrity and customer satisfaction.

The other side of the coin is where you find yourself if you are searching for a network marketing business opportunity. On this side you?re responsible for making the correct decision by what kind of MLM business you wish to join. You have to be thinking about the product you need to distribute as if you don?t want it, why would anybody else? You also want to make an informed choice. Therefore, the different options are a bit of time looking up the company online and discovering whether or not it?s a high network marketing business or maybe it?s a lesser-known effort. The more popular it is, the greater your chances are to acquire prospects faster than if no one includes a clue what your merchandise is.

What side with the coin are you betting on? Either way, there doesn?t appear to be a losing chance at all.

Want to uncover the secret of a successful home business network marketing? Find out more by visiting our website. Read more here.

Tags: Internet Marketing

Source: http://www.candam-marketing.com/WP/11658/getting-into-home-business-network-marketing-2/

black and tan dwight howard trade ncaa bracket 2012 2012 ncaa bracket john carlson greg smith catamount

NASSSblog: EVENT: The Critical Bicycling Studies Tour de California

Bicicultures Roadshow: The Critical Bicycling Studies Tour de California

Call for Participants

April 16-17, 2013 in Davis, California


What is it?The Bicicultures Roadshow will be a time for activists and researchers to talk, ride, eat, and play as we discuss and experience bicycling cultures. At this two-day conference, we will grapple with the shifting role of bicycle research and activism as it crosses lines between policy, recreation, and radical organizing. The event will take place in Davis, a Platinum Bicycle Friendly Community, home of the U.S. Bicycling Hall of Fame, and site of the first bike lanes in the U.S. This event is made possible through support from the University of California Transportation Center.
Why Bicicultures??Bicicultures? refers to the multiple social worlds of bicycling that co-exist, but may not overlap, in shared spaces. Rather than taking bicycling as a unitary object of analysis, we seek to investigate the construction of diverse meanings around the practice of cycling across time and space.
What will happen at the event?Rather than following a traditional conference format of breakout sessions and individual papers, this event will emphasize ongoing discussion among all participants. Events may include keynote speakers, roundtable discussions, interactive panel presentations, workshops, field trips, and bicycle rides. We anticipate vibrant discussions about how diverse communities are using and thinking about bicycling as a tool to maintain and reinvent their worlds. Specific topics and formats will be formulated based on participant interest. We anticipate conversations around topics such as race, gender, class, ability, gentrification, activism, public space, embodiment, technology, design, recreation and sport, sustainability, mobilities, and more.
How can I participate?We encourage participation from researchers and activists working in urban and transportation bicycling and in sport and recreational cycling, as well as those concerned with bicycling's social and cultural life. To participate, please submit a short piece (~500 words) explaining your interest in bicycling cultures, and what research, project, experience, or knowledge you would like to share at this event. Depending on your inclination, this may take the form of a research abstract, description of activist work, questions for discussion, workshop ideas, etc. Include your name, affiliation (if appropriate), and contact information. Group submissions welcome. Participation may be limited, so please submit by February 10th for full consideration. Submissions and inquiries can be sent to Sarah Rebolloso McCullough at smcc@ucdavis.edu and Adonia Lugo at lugoa@uci.edu.
What makes it a roadshow? Prior to the Davis event, we will also participate in a field investigation of Los Angeles' bicycling worlds in tandem with the Association of American Geographers conference (April 9-14th). This event will include organized rides and a roundtable discussion about the history and future of the LA bike movement. Participants in the Davis event are welcome, though not expected, to participate in LA events. Those who are able to attend all events will enjoy vibrant conversations with people dedicated to the study and practice of bicycling from a multitude of perspectives?from sanctioned bicycle events to autonomous actions, from bicycling street fair to bike repair garages, from cities to countryside. Participants are encouraged to attend as much or as little of the Roadshow as desired, all nine days or just an afternoon. Contact the organizers for more information about the LA components.

Source: http://nasssblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/event-critical-bicycling-studies-tour.html

Google Fiber Olympics Schedule 2012 Olympic Medal Count 2012 Olympics 2012 Olympic Schedule 2012 NBC Olympics NBC Olympics schedule

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Small business: Growing fast, but staying true | OregonLive.com

Richard Satnick calls it the "accidental empire."

It's the point where an entrepreneur looks around and realizes a small business' success is more problematic than fun. Satnick reached it last year with Laughing Planet Cafe, which since 2000 had grown from one restaurant to seven in Portland, with two more in Eugene and another in Corvallis.

The big time beckoned. People want healthy, affordable cafe meals. It's not just a Portland foodie trend, and it's not going away. Further expansion seemed natural.

But Satnick's heart wasn't in it. In December he sold Laughing Planet to a group headed by his chief executive, Franz Spielvogel, a longtime friend and co-conspirator eager to expand.

He wasn't the first Portland-area entrepreneur to reach that decision point. Oregon is headquarters to only two Fortune 500 firms - Nike and Precision Castparts - but the state bustles with small and midsize companies. Some of those companies inevitably grow to the point where they have to decide whether to go big, and it's not always an easy choice.

Something has to give. In addition to financial risk, founding entrepreneurs may find expansion requires they give up control and a sense of identity.

Some reach the junction and jump, of course. After seven years of riotous sales, production and workforce growth, the Dahl family at Dave's Killer Bread in Milwaukie worried the business was expanding beyond their ability to manage it.

In December, the Dahls announced they'd brought in an equity and management partner. Goode Partners LLC of New York, which specializes in $10 million to $30 million investments, assumed half ownership of the business in exchange for an infusion of professional expertise and an undisclosed amount of cash. Look for Dave's Killer Bread to go national, first by driving deeper into the California market and then pushing into such places as Denver, Chicago and Dallas.

Although the end results differed, the deals involving Laughing Planet Cafe and Dave's Killer Bread shared a key feature. In each case, the founders insisted on transitions that retained the values, culture and quality they instilled.

"The right successor"
Laughing Planet Cafes, quirky and committed to fresh, local fare, won't become a chain of cookie-cutter fast-food outlets.

"It's not enough to hand it off," Satnick says. "I wanted to find the right successor who cherishes the brand."

Likewise, Dave Dahl and his nephew, CEO Shobi Dahl, won't begin producing Dave's version of Wonder Bread. Written into the deal with Goode Partners are requirements that the "breadquarters" will remain local, the company's practice of giving ex-cons a chance to work won't change and the founding family will continue to oversee quality control.

It's a business trend with a distinctly Portland twist, says David Howitt, president of Meriwether Group, which helped find capital and partners in both deals. Increasingly, Howitt says, owners of successful, fast-growing small businesses have idealistic ambition beyond selling for buckets of money.

Consumers are looking for that business ethos, and selected investment banks embrace it as well, Howitt says.

"Told the right way it's part of a story about value," he says.

It's a tightrope walk, however. Some Portlanders howled in 2011 when TSG Consumer Partners, a private New York equity firm, invested in Stumptown Coffee Roasters. In November 2012, Bike Gallery owner Jay Graves sold his business to the owner of the Trek Bicycle Superstore and to Kelly Aicher, a longtime Bike Gallery employee.

Meriwether Group was involved in both of those deals too. The Northwest Portland company invests in some companies itself and guides others through the process, introducing them to investment banks and equity partners that can take small businesses to the next level.

Boos in Portland

In Portland, however, reaction to such changes is sometimes negative. Howitt finds it frustrating when companies infused by outside capital are booed as sellouts.

Regardless, it's something we're likely to see more often. Howitt contends that a number of local companies have the combination of quality, verve and back story to attract investors and drive expansion to other markets, if they choose to do so. He quickly rattles off a string of area businesses he sees with potential: Grand Central Bakery; Pizzicato; Carbon Audio; Bunk Sandwiches; Pok Pok's drinking vinegars; Alma Chocolate; and Schoolhouse Electric & Supply Co.

Business owners considering expansion or whether to take on partners need to carefully evaluate their situation and understand the correct rate of growth, says Tammy Marquez-Oldham, director of the Small Business Development Center and CLIMB Center for Advancement at Portland Community College.

They should ask themselves, Marquez-Oldham says, "what is my business today, who is my customer today? What do they value today and how do I find them?"

The decision by Dave's Killer Bread, the homegrown bakery that sold half ownership to Goode Partners, is an example of a business assessing how it wanted to grow and why, Marquez-Oldham says.

"It comes down to being true to what your business is," she says. "Everything is driven from that value base."

Other business owners will do that kind of assessment and decide to stay local, she says.

"That's OK," she says. "Not every business needs to be destined to be a national-level business."

Get legal advice

Shobi Dahl, CEO of Dave's Killer Bread, agrees an honest self-assessment is key.

"The most important thing is to be able to admit you don't know everything and ask for help," Dahl says. Marketing, finance and operations expertise is out there to be found, he says.

"As we grew we'd go in and out of thinking we knew what we were doing," he says. "But if we'd brought in the right people and the right help earlier, we'd be even stronger than we are now."

Legal advice is crucial, he says. The bakery's law firm, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, reviewed every detail of the deal with Goode Partners.

"The important thing is to have a lot of conversations upfront and get a lot of things in writing," Dahl says. "It costs money, but it was very worth it to have all that advice on the front end."

When the deal is done, the parties should be "open and honest" in discussing it publicly, Dahl says. "If you feel you need to hide something about the deal, there's probably some reason you shouldn't be doing it."

Transitions are simpler if a big company swallows a smaller firm in cases where the owner wants nothing more to do with the business. Then the sale boils down to a dollar figure.

But things get trickier when a small business wants to retain its identity even as it brings in powerful partners or capital.

Those who have been through it say small entrepreneurs should determine whether the prospective partners understand the business' story. If they don't get it, they aren't likely to protect the history, culture and values important to the founders.

"An accidental empire"

In the case of Laughing Planet Cafe, owner Satnick did a more personal evaluation.

"For me the motivation was perhaps a little different than Dave's (Killer Bread), who had gotten such a monster on his hands he had to bring in expertise and money," Satnick says.

"I recognized that my strengths and interests are in the early stages of entrepreneur inventiveness: the excitement of creating a brand, of plowing a new field when people are telling you it's crazy."

The expansion of Laughing Planet Cafe became "almost an accidental empire that happened while I was off fighting dragons," Satnick says. Running 10 cafes "required a different mindset - things that are not my strengths, not my interests."

Satnick says he recognized the business should continue growing and that Spielvogel, his CEO, was better equipped to oversee the expansion.

"I'm kind of the thrill-seeker at the beginning of things," he says. "At some level I needed to get out of their way."

Working with Meriwether, Satnick completed a deal in which Spielvogel became principal owner, with backers and financing that allow for growth.

As for Satnick, he's back in his comfort zone. He started Dick's Kitchen, a "meat-centric" diner on Southeast Belmont Street.

And now, with an opening on Northwest 21st Avenue, he has two of them.

--Eric Mortenson
?

Source: http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2013/01/small_business_growing_fast_bu.html

breaking news Google News Newton virginia tech shooting Bbc News China abc

Louie Giglio and the New State Church

Featured Posts

Opinions

The Challenge We Face

Planned Parenthood

What sets this non-profit apart from most is the fact that in 2011-2012 it ...

January 12, 2013|8:54 am

Here's why this matters. The statement Giglio made that was so controversial is essentially a near-direct quotation from the Christian Scriptures. Unrepentant homosexuals, Giglio said (as with unrepentant sinners of all kinds) "will not inherit the kingdom of God." That's 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. Giglio said, "it's not easy to change, but it is possible to change." The Bible says God "commands all people everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30), the same gospel, Giglio says, "that I say to you and that you would say to me."

The Christian faith in every expression has held for 2000 years that sexual immorality is sinful. This same Christian faith has maintained, again in every branch, that sexual expression outside of conjugal marriage is sin. And the Christian faith has maintained universally that all persons are sinners and that no sinner can enter the kingdom without repentance. This is hardly new.

The "shock" with which this so-called "anti-gay" stance is articulated by the Left is akin to the Pork Producers Association denouncing a Muslim Imam's invitation because he is "anti-agriculture" due to Koranic dietary restrictions.

In fact, by the standards of this controversy, no Muslim imam or Orthodox Jewish rabbi alive can pray at a presidential inauguration.

When it is now impossible for one who holds to the catholic Christian view of marriage and the gospel to pray at a public event, we now have a de facto established state church. Just as the pre-constitutional Anglican and congregational churches required a license to preach in order to exclude Baptists, the new state church requires a "license" of embracing sexual liberation in all its forms.

Follow us

Note, this now doesn't simply exclude harsh and intemperate statements or even activism. Simply holding the view held by every Roman pontiff and by every congregation and synagogue in the world until very recent days is enough to make one "radioactive" in public.

As citizens, we ought to insist that the President stand up to his "base" and articulate a vision of a healthy pluralism in the public square. Notice that the problem is not that this evangelical wants to "impose his religion" on the rest of society. The problem is not that he wants to exclude homosexuals or others from the public square or of their civil rights. The problem is that he won't say that they can go to heaven without repentance. That's not a civil issue, but a religious test of orthodoxy.

As Christians, we ought to recognize that the old majoritarian understanding of church/state relations is outmoded. Our situation today is not to hold on to some form of American civil religion. Our situation today is more akin to the minority religions of America's past: colonial Baptists, nineteenth-century Baptists, early twentieth-century Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses, who are appealing simply for the right to exist at all, in the face of an established religion armed with popular support and, in the fullness of time, state power.

It turns out we're circling around to where we should have been all along: with the understanding that religious liberty isn't "toleration" and separation of church and state isn't secularism.

We don't have a natural right to pray at anyone's inauguration. But when one is pressured out from a previous invitation because he is too "toxic" for simply mentioning once something universal in the Christian faith, we ought to see what we're looking at: a state church.

And as one old revolutionary-era Baptist said, as he went in and out of prison for preaching: "There is nothing so offensive to an established church than the gospel of Jesus Christ."

Adapted from Russell D. Moore's weblog at russellmoore.com.

Dr. Russell D. Moore is the Dean of the School of Theology and Senior Vice-President for Academic Administration at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. He also serves as a preaching pastor at Highview Baptist Church, where he ministers weekly at the congregation's Fegenbush location. Dr. Moore is the author of The Kingdom of Christ and Adopted for Life.

Source: http://www.christianpost.com/news/louie-giglio-and-the-new-state-church-88151/

bracket vangogh yield crossbow airhead atherosclerosis steven tyler

'Argo,' 'Silver Linings' win at Critics' Choice

By Chris Michaud , Reuters

Ben Affleck's Iran hostage drama "Argo," "Lincoln" star Daniel Day-Lewis and "Zero Dark Thirty"'s Jessica Chastain were among big winners at the Critics' Choice Movie Awards on Thursday, taking honors for best picture, actor and actress, with Affleck nabbing the prize for best director.

Mario Anzuoni / Reuters

Director Ben Affleck accepts the best director award for the movie "Argo" at the Critics' Choice Awards in Santa Monica, Calif., on Thursday.

The all-star "Silver Linings Playbook" swept the comedy awards, winning best comedy film, best comedy actor for Bradley Cooper and best comedy actress, which went to Jennifer Lawrence.

The 250-member Broadcast Film Critics Association, the largest film critics organization in the United States and Canada, also gave the film its best acting ensemble prize at the event in Santa Monica, Calif.

Affleck, known mostly as actor and who was overlooked for directing "Argo" earlier on Thursday when the Academy Award nominations were announced, began his acceptance with the quip: "I would like to thank the academy," before adding "I'm kidding. This is the one that counts."

Day-Lewis won for his acclaimed performance in the title role of Steven Spielberg's historical drama "Lincoln," while Chastain took the prize for "Zero Dark Thirty," about the hunt for Osama Bin Laden.

Kevin Winter / Getty Images

Actor Daniel Day-Lewis accepts the best actor award for "Lincoln" at the Critics' Choice Awards.

Mario Anzuoni / Reuters

Actress Jessica Chastain accepts the award for best actress for "Zero Dark Thirty."

It was one of only two awards for "Lincoln," which led the Oscar nominations with 12. The Oscar runner-up, "Life of Pi," won only two technical awards.

Lawrence took home two awards, also winning best actress in an action movie for "The Hunger Games."

"Critics aren't so bad," she said as she accepted the award, later riffing on the line when she won her second award, for "Silver Linings Playbook," saying "Seriously, I love critics."

Many stars who were nominated just hours earlier for Oscars, Hollywood's top honors, were on hand, including "Les Miserables" star Hugh Jackman, Robert De Niro and Anne Hathaway, who won the award for best supporting actress for "Les Miserables."

Best supporting actor went to Philip Seymour Hoffman for "The Master."

Mario Anzuoni / Reuters

Actor Bradley Cooper accepts the award for best actor in a comedy movie for "Silver Linings Playbook."

Director David O. Russell dedicated the "Silver Linings" award to his son, saying "I made it to give him hope," adding, "That's my silver lining."

European director Michael Haneke's drama "Amour," about an aging couple struggling with failing health and mortality and which scored several major Oscar nominations on Thursday, won the award for best foreign language film.

The prize for best sci-fi/horror film went to "Looper," while "Searching for Sugarman" won best documentary.

The screenwriting awards were won by Quentin Tarantino for his original screenplay for "Django Unchained" and Tony Kushner who adapted the screenplay for "Lincoln."

British singer Adele's song "Skyfall" from the James Bond film of the same name won best song, and star Daniel Craig was named best actor in a action film. The film also won best action movie.

Danny Moloshok / Reuters

Actress Quvenzhane Wallis poses with the best young actor or actress award backstage for her role in "Beasts of the Southern Wild."

Nine-year old Quvenzhane Wallis, star of "Beasts of the Southern Wild" who became the youngest best actress Oscar nominee in history on Thursday, was named best young actor or actress. She accepted her award clutching a pink-cased electronic device, from which she read her speech as she grinned broadly.

The awards were handed out ahead of Sunday's Golden Globes and a slew of other award shows that narrow the field for the Oscars, which will be held on Feb. 24.

Writer-producer-director Judd Apatow received a special "genius" award created to honor "an unprecedented demonstration of excellence in the cinematic arts."

Related content:

Source: http://todayentertainment.today.com/_news/2013/01/10/16455529-argo-silver-linings-playbook-win-at-critics-choice-awards?lite

ener1 national chocolate cake day epstein joshua komisarjevsky barney frank barney frank kim richards

Friday, January 11, 2013

?In The Studio,? Kaggle?s Anthony Goldbloom Is Building A New Kind Of Marketplace

Kaggle"In the Studio" this week welcomes a former economist who worked for his country's treasury department and reserve bank, a former intern with The Economist Group, and by way of his very unique company bio page, a former windsurfer and kiteboarder who is now settled in San Francisco and the founder and CEO of one of the most interesting data companies I've come across.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/lGAFZIm5vR4/

Mother Jones cars Bacon Number Kate Middleton photos Chi Magazine Kate Middleton Nude Photos glee

Keeping Environmental Reporting Strong Won't Be Easy | The ...

Those who care deeply about environmental issues were understandably concerned Friday after learning that The Times was dismantling its special team ? or ?pod? ? of seven reporters and two editors.

Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told InsideClimate News that The Times?s decision was ?worrying.?

?Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues,? she said. ?It?s always a huge loss to see them dismantled ? it?s not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next.?

On Twitter, Dan Froomkin, a journalist, wrote: ?NYT dismantles its nine-person environment desk ? but says that won?t affect climate coverage. How is that possible??

And Ben Grossman-Cohen, writing for OxfamAmerica.org, joined the chorus, calling the decision ?an unmitigated disaster.?

Top editors at The Times say that this is a structural change only, and that the paper?s commitment to the topic will remain intact.

In a memo to newsroom staff, the executive editor Jill Abramson mentioned the change in the context of overall newsroom restructuring, amid efforts to reduce newsroom numbers and cut expenses:

We are changing some of traditional architecture of the newsroom, including in the leadership and editing ranks. For instance, we have decided not to continue having separate editing and reporting groups on the environment and how we live. We will continue to cover these areas of national and international life just as aggressively and Dean and I are having talks with all the journalists in those groups about how to do this without the existing ?pod? structure.

Even if there was no fiscal pressure to do so, we would be making some structural changes in the newsroom to balance our precious journalistic resources. In order to expand digitally and internationally in the exciting ways we have planned, it is natural to reshape our contours.

And the managing editor Dean Baquet offered more reassuring words:

?We can tell the story just as well without the infrastructure,? he told me.

As for sheer numbers, he added: ?If we have fewer reporters, we won?t have far fewer. We?re still going to have tons of people on this.?

He said no decision has been made on the Green blog: ?If it has impact and audience it will survive,? he said.

Andrew C. Revkin, a former Times reporter who now writes the Dot.Earth blog for The Times?s Opinion pages, told me that the decision does not worry him: ?What works best is a group of like-minded people getting excited about something,? and then working with a strong editor to bring the ideas to fruition. He sees this change as one ?about efficiency,? not quality of content. His blog post on Friday provided details.

Sandy Keenan, the environment editor, told me she wishes the decision had not been made.

?Of course, I?m disappointed,? she said. ?I?ll try to hold everyone to their promise that the coverage won?t suffer.? She is uncertain of her next move, she said.

Elisabeth Rosenthal, a medical doctor and a 19-year Times veteran reporter, who has done outstanding work as part of the environment pod, told me that she sees pros and cons to the pod structure.

?The pro is that you give specific attention to a subject that needs it,? she said. ?The con is that it takes the subject out of the mainstream of news flow.? The subject areas ?don?t have their own real estate in the newspaper, and that can mean that it?s harder to get attention? for their stories.

?There?s not a lot of news in this area ? we?re watching glaciers melting ? so there isn?t an urgency to get things into the paper right away,? Ms. Rosenthal said. Integration into the main desks can be a help with that.

Here?s my take:

Symbolically, this is bad news. And symbolism matters ? it shows a commitment and an intensity of interest in a crucially important topic.

In real life, it doesn?t have to be bad news. A pod?s structure, outside the major desks ? Foreign, Business, National and Metro ? by its nature means that the coverage is not integrated into the regular coverage of those desks, which have their own space in the paper and their own internal clout.

If coverage of the environment is not to suffer, a lot of people ? including The Times?s highest ranking editors ? are going to have to make sure that it doesn?t.

They say they will. But maintaining that focus will be a particular challenge in a newsroom that?s undergoing intensive change as it becomes ever more digital while simultaneously cutting costs.

Source: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/keeping-environmental-reporting-strong-wont-be-easy/

david decastro aj jenkins shea mcclellin nfl draft 2012 whitney mercilus 2012 nfl draft picks andrew luck